TinBoats.net
The original aluminum boat site!
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Blog
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Boats
Electrical
Evaluating Humminbird vs Garmin Fish Finder/GPS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support TinBoats.net:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott F" data-source="post: 445929" data-attributes="member: 23059"><p>For many, (like me) the downscan imaging is not a very valuable tool. First, down and side imaging do a very poor job of showing fish. Second, in places like natural lakes and ponds, there is only rocks and weeds on the bottom which traditional sonar shows just fine along with better images of fish. </p><p>The Garmin Striker series of depth finders have GPS but no mapping. You can see a track of where you have been but not where you are in relation to depth or shorelines. You must have the Striker Plus series to get the Quikdraw Contours map creation software. f you move up to the echoMap series, they include 17,000 pre loaded maps at no extra charge that I have found to be very accurate. If your lake or pond is not included, you can create your own high definition maps with QuickDraw also included free. With the Humminbird, map chips are not included and must be purchased separately. Garmin has had older models that are very similar to current models on sale for months at substantial savings. You don’t say what kind of boat you have, but I believe, with the Humminbird, you have to purchase a second transducer if you want to be able to see the depth if you are running at more than a few miles an hour.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott F, post: 445929, member: 23059"] For many, (like me) the downscan imaging is not a very valuable tool. First, down and side imaging do a very poor job of showing fish. Second, in places like natural lakes and ponds, there is only rocks and weeds on the bottom which traditional sonar shows just fine along with better images of fish. The Garmin Striker series of depth finders have GPS but no mapping. You can see a track of where you have been but not where you are in relation to depth or shorelines. You must have the Striker Plus series to get the Quikdraw Contours map creation software. f you move up to the echoMap series, they include 17,000 pre loaded maps at no extra charge that I have found to be very accurate. If your lake or pond is not included, you can create your own high definition maps with QuickDraw also included free. With the Humminbird, map chips are not included and must be purchased separately. Garmin has had older models that are very similar to current models on sale for months at substantial savings. You don’t say what kind of boat you have, but I believe, with the Humminbird, you have to purchase a second transducer if you want to be able to see the depth if you are running at more than a few miles an hour. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boats
Electrical
Evaluating Humminbird vs Garmin Fish Finder/GPS
Top