I was just looking on the Sea Ark Website at tunel hulls and Jet tunnel hulls. There is a difference between the two different types of Tunnel huls in thier boats.
The Prop tunnel hull is described as....
Copied from Sea Ark Website: https://www.seaarkboats.com/boat.php?measure=Standard&boat=1652MVT
"SeaArk’s Tunnel Hulls are designed to be used with a conventional prop driven engine. The transom is higher than on a conventional hull and a “tunnel” is designed into the bottom of the boat which allows the engine to be raised so the prop turns inside the “tunnel.” Tunnel Hulls are most often used when the operator needs to run in very shallow water but does not want to lose the “bite” of the prop. Standard features and options are similar to Non-Tunnel Hull models".
And the Jet Tunnel hull is described as:
Copied from Sea Ark Website: https://www.seaarkboats.com/boat.php?measure=Standard&boat=1652MVJT
"SeaArk’s Jet Tunnel Hulls are designed to be used with a jet driven outboard. The Jet Tunnel design includes a flat roof in the tunnel to direct water back to the intake of the jet. The thrust of a jet outboard is about 70% of an equal sized engine with a prop. This fact and the fact that a jet uses water for propulsion instead of a metal prop, means that the operator loses some speed, directional control, and performance. What is gained with a jet is the ability to operate in extreme shallow water conditions without the fear of ruining a prop. Most of our customers using Jet Tunnel boats use them in shallow rivers where they need to pass through extreme shallow spots. Standard features and options are similar to Non-Jet Tunnel Hull models, however, they are offered in center console only".
I would only guess that a jet outboard would not work AS WELL on a tunnel hull meant for a prop, and the other way around due to the specific designs.
When I was looking at buying the G3 I noticed that the Jet Tunnel was very shallow, just enough to give the shoe some clearance (you can see this in the pic above). And the Prop tunnel was much more pronounced to make room for almost the entire prop. Only the skeg was below the hull of the boat.
I think the engineering, design, and science behind boat hulls, even something as simple as a "Tin-Boat" is very interesting. I am really enjoying this thread. Especially learning about the different pts of view, applications, hull designs and materials used on everyones boats from all over the country (and Canada). The guys in MO are running different setups than the guys in Ak, and the guys in PA are running heavy duty with UHMW. Some are running jets in FL and yet others swear up and down that its a bad idea. Inboard Jets running class 5 rapids in Idaho, and guys in Alabama running jets on riveted jon boats.
I am learning a lot from everyone on here and will put it to good use on my next boat.