freeisforme
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2023
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 46
- LOCATION
- NJ
Over the last few months I picked up two motors, one a 1958 Johnson FD12, the other a 1960 Evinrude Fastwin 18hp
The FD12 has great compression, the owner quit using it because the lower unit leaked oil after getting some fishing line behind the prop.
The Evinrude, was a low hour motor that the owner suddenly found had two frozen clamp screws and a few other issues.
They appear very similar, and I'd like to make one from the pair. My question is whether to build it as 58 Johnson or the 60 Evinrude?
I'm leaning toward the Evinrude, mostly because I liked the easier to open cover vs the awkward contraption clam shell style on the FD12. (I can just picture having to fiddle with that thing in the water and dropping it, never to see it again. The fiberglass shell of the Evinrude just lifts right off like a more modern motor. The 1960 Evinrude also uses a normal fuel tank.
I checked the compression on each motor, the FD12 has 88/89 psi on both cylinders, the Fastwin has 85/87 psi both using a Matco compression tester, using my Snap On tester both gave slightly higher results. Both motors got a shot of oil and about ten pulls before testing compression
Both lower units had clean oil but the FD12 had some oiliness around the prop shaft. Both have what appear to be new or minty perfect props.
Is any one of them more desirable for any particular reason, other than the fact that the 1960 Evinrude uses a normal fuel tank? (I can convert the FD12 too).
The power head seems easier to get at on the Evinrude, there's better access to lower parts of the power head because of the wider pan. The paint on the 1960 Evinrude is better, the Johnson is well faded.
Are the lower units the same? both are 5 bolt style so I'm pretty sure they will bolt up but am not sure about the shaft splines and driveshaft length?
I have a bag of impellers if needed and a box of J8C spark plugs, and a pair of later style plastic coils so I can make one of these run without spending any money its just a matter of which one.
The FD12 has great compression, the owner quit using it because the lower unit leaked oil after getting some fishing line behind the prop.
The Evinrude, was a low hour motor that the owner suddenly found had two frozen clamp screws and a few other issues.
They appear very similar, and I'd like to make one from the pair. My question is whether to build it as 58 Johnson or the 60 Evinrude?
I'm leaning toward the Evinrude, mostly because I liked the easier to open cover vs the awkward contraption clam shell style on the FD12. (I can just picture having to fiddle with that thing in the water and dropping it, never to see it again. The fiberglass shell of the Evinrude just lifts right off like a more modern motor. The 1960 Evinrude also uses a normal fuel tank.
I checked the compression on each motor, the FD12 has 88/89 psi on both cylinders, the Fastwin has 85/87 psi both using a Matco compression tester, using my Snap On tester both gave slightly higher results. Both motors got a shot of oil and about ten pulls before testing compression
Both lower units had clean oil but the FD12 had some oiliness around the prop shaft. Both have what appear to be new or minty perfect props.
Is any one of them more desirable for any particular reason, other than the fact that the 1960 Evinrude uses a normal fuel tank? (I can convert the FD12 too).
The power head seems easier to get at on the Evinrude, there's better access to lower parts of the power head because of the wider pan. The paint on the 1960 Evinrude is better, the Johnson is well faded.
Are the lower units the same? both are 5 bolt style so I'm pretty sure they will bolt up but am not sure about the shaft splines and driveshaft length?
I have a bag of impellers if needed and a box of J8C spark plugs, and a pair of later style plastic coils so I can make one of these run without spending any money its just a matter of which one.