I've been following this thread with interest, mostly from a process view.
The other evening I came across a YouTube vid in which a guy was replacing his rotted transom. He appeared to be facing a number of the same issues as you have been encountering with holes and screws and so on. I'm linking that video HERE. I think the vid is worth the time, even if you don't use the primary solution he used. It may spark some ideas as you solve the challenges you face with your boat.
The vid shows the guy using a pourable epoxy to replace the rotted ply in the transom. It was more expensive than ply, but less expensive than COOSA board. It provided a waterproof structure and did not require him to remove all the through-transom obstacles like drainplugs and such. He discusses how he dealt with those obstacles. The pourable also easily deals with irregular surfaces.
I understand what you have said several times about cost. But your time and labor are also resources that cost something, even though you might tend to discount its value. Decent quality plywood does cost, and there will be some waste; it's inevitable. There will always be a trade to be considered. How much is your time valued against the cost delta between the less expensive plywood solution (with all of the adhesives, sealant, and such) and an alternative solution?
The other evening I came across a YouTube vid in which a guy was replacing his rotted transom. He appeared to be facing a number of the same issues as you have been encountering with holes and screws and so on. I'm linking that video HERE. I think the vid is worth the time, even if you don't use the primary solution he used. It may spark some ideas as you solve the challenges you face with your boat.
The vid shows the guy using a pourable epoxy to replace the rotted ply in the transom. It was more expensive than ply, but less expensive than COOSA board. It provided a waterproof structure and did not require him to remove all the through-transom obstacles like drainplugs and such. He discusses how he dealt with those obstacles. The pourable also easily deals with irregular surfaces.
I understand what you have said several times about cost. But your time and labor are also resources that cost something, even though you might tend to discount its value. Decent quality plywood does cost, and there will be some waste; it's inevitable. There will always be a trade to be considered. How much is your time valued against the cost delta between the less expensive plywood solution (with all of the adhesives, sealant, and such) and an alternative solution?