RiverBottomOutdoors
Well-known member
I would ride in it if you paid me. Would work on a wider welded 14ft boat.
Country Dave said:LOL life is short. It’s ok to have a little fun.
Last year I attended an amazing workshop called Coach for America led by former NFL player (and now coach and Minister) Joe Ehrmann. Joe mentioned something that truly changed the way I think about my life. He referred to a study of older people who were in the “twilight” of their lives; and the study asked these wise elders a powerful question:
“What do you wish you had done more of in life?”
1) Left More of A Legacy.
2) 2) Reflected More.
3) 3) Taken More Risks.
Now let me be crystal clear about this lest I be misunderstood. There is a definite distinction between reckless abandon and tacking a little risk. As long as you don’t recklessly but someone else in harm’s way, live a little. Take more risk. I was in the military; I drove motorcycles since I was old enough to get on one. I drive on the crowed highways and byways of the country and I fly often.
We take risks every day, so why not take a little risk now and then so that we might enjoy life a little. Have a little fun and not have the regret of those who are in the twilight of their life looking back and wishing they took more risks.
RiverBottomOutdoors said:LOL... #4 Do more stupid stuff.
that would be the smart thing to do, but i never was very smartMrSimon said:If the motor really only cost you $500 and it runs fine, then simply sell it .... get a proper motor for the boat .... and pocket a thousand dollars.
exactly what i was looking for, ideas like this! thank youcatmansteve said:Check out my build link in my sig if you need ideas for how to brace the transom,
nick4203 said:lol you will be flying for sure my buddies valco with the 35hp is pretty quick and is hella fun we haven't even fished out of it yet haha to busy cruising all around the lakes and rivers and what not everytime we go out with it
by "pods" i am assuming you mean adding flotation of some sort. problem is, adding flotation only helps when the hull is full of water which is hopefully never. i could fill the entire hull w/ closed cell foam 6' high & it would float no different than if i took all the foam out if there was no water inside the hull. my buddy has a fiberglass boat w/ a 25hp that he left tied to his sailboat for a month or so, it had a slow leak + rain, it filled up w/ water. i went out to check it for him & it was floating 6" or so above the surface perfectly level despite being so full of water it looked like it should have sank. that's what the flotation "pods" are designed by the manufacturer to do. they float the hull level so it can be salvaged. that's why they put the flotation mid, fore, & aft. or in the case of boston whaler, throughout between the floor & hull bottom.JMichael said:Like Country Dave, I don't think the extra HP is going to make that big of a difference. I think the problem if any would be when you couple the extra HP with that much added weight on the transom. If you were to add some decent size pods to the boat, that would negate the added weight and solve any potential problem. But without the pods being added, I'd like to watch. :shock:
chevyrulz said:nick4203 said:lol you will be flying for sure my buddies valco with the 35hp is pretty quick and is hella fun we haven't even fished out of it yet haha to busy cruising all around the lakes and rivers and what not everytime we go out with it
i hope so, i know 35hp isn't too much with proper caution from the operator because i've driven a 30 2 stroke on same hull, and have seen plenty with 35s & 40s on same hull...but my main concern was/is the integrity of the transom, and the rest of the hull itself for that matter, because of how unbelievably heavy honda made this motor. there's so many rednecks like myself around here, i won't have a problem selling it if i can keep it afloat [-o<
by "pods" i am assuming you mean adding flotation of some sort. problem is, adding flotation only helps when the hull is full of water which is hopefully never. i could fill the entire hull w/ closed cell foam 6' high & it would float no different than if i took all the foam out if there was no water inside the hull. my buddy has a fiberglass boat w/ a 25hp that he left tied to his sailboat for a month or so, it had a slow leak + rain, it filled up w/ water. i went out to check it for him & it was floating 6" or so above the surface perfectly level despite being so full of water it looked like it should have sank. that's what the flotation "pods" are designed by the manufacturer to do. they float the hull level so it can be salvaged. that's why they put the flotation mid, fore, & aft. or in the case of boston whaler, throughout between the floor & hull bottom.JMichael said:Like Country Dave, I don't think the extra HP is going to make that big of a difference. I think the problem if any would be when you couple the extra HP with that much added weight on the transom. If you were to add some decent size pods to the boat, that would negate the added weight and solve any potential problem. But without the pods being added, I'd like to watch. :shock:
i do plan to add flotation, i have closed cell foam in a can from west marine with which i could fill rear pods if i deck the transom to rear bench reinforment. & i'm already going to put foamboard under the flooring
The motor is big on the top end, it has a typical size lower unit for other motors close to it in hp.RiverBottomOutdoors said:Flotation pods aren't going to help. Were would he put them? The motor is wider than the transom.
JMichael said:The motor is big on the top end, it has a typical size lower unit for other motors close to it in hp.RiverBottomOutdoors said:Flotation pods aren't going to help. Were would he put them? The motor is wider than the transom.